Scotus on Absolute Power and Knowledge (Continuation and end)
Abstract
In Rep. exam. I d. 44 q. 1, Scotus offers a discussion, unique within his work, of cases in which a traditional account of scientific knowledge of nature is transformed into a knowledge "as in most cases" (ut in pluribus). Underlying this particular model of scientific knowledge is an account of God’s omnipotence and absolute power. With the aim of explaining this model, this study explores certain fundamental theoretical elements of Rep. exam. I d. 44 q. 1, i.e., definitions of divine omnipotence and absolute power, and Scotus's general theory of contingency, as well as the background context of contingency and divine scientia in Rep. exam. I d. 38-44. The stage is then set for the introduction of the idea of knowledge “as in most cases”, which Scotus had likely encountered in Analytica posteriore. Possible connections between omnipotence, absolute power, and knowledge ut in pluribus are then analyzed. Because Scotus's model of scientia ut in pluribus depends heavily on a critical view of the regularity of the movements of heavenly bodies, some notes on Scotus's cosmology are offered, as well as comparison between the scope of Scotus's “probable” knowledge of nature and Aristotle’s view of the same within many passages of his opera concerning the knowledge of physical universals.Downloads
References
Berceville, G. (2004). Du miracle au surnaturel. De Thomas d’Aquin à Duns Scot: un changement de problématique. In: Boulnois, O., Karger, E., Solère, J.L & Sonzag, G. (eds.). Duns Scot à Paris 1302-2002. Turnhout: Brepols, 563-579.
Boulnois, O., Karger, E., Solère, J.L & Sonzag, G. (eds.) (2004). Duns Scot à Paris 1302-2002. Turnhout: Brepols.
Cezar, C. R. (2004). Das natürliche Gesetz und das konkrete praktische Urteil nach der Lehre des Johannes Duns Scotus. Kevelaer: Verlag Butzon & Becker.
Courtenay, W J. (1984). IV. The Dialectic of Divine Omnipotence. In Courtenay, W. J. Covenant and Causality in Medieval Thought. London: Variorum Reprints, 1-37.
Courtenay, W. J. (1990). Capacity and Volition. A History of the Distinction of Absolute and Ordained Power. Bergamo: Pierluigi Lubrina Editore.
Cross, R. (1998). The Physics of Duns Scotus: The Scientific Context of a Theological Vision. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
De Boni, L. A. (2006). Sobre a vida e a obra de Duns Scotus. Patristica et Mediaevalia 27, 51-72.
Demange, D. (2004). “Objet premier d’inclusion virtuelle” - Introduction à la théorie de la science de Jean Duns Scot. In: Boulnois, O., Karger, E., Solère, J.L & Sonzag, G. (eds.). Duns Scot à Paris 1302-2002. Turnhout: Brepols, 89-116.
French, S. (2009). Ciência. Transl. André Klaudat. Porto Alegre: Artmed (Conceitos-Chave em Filosofia).
Hankinson, R. J. (1995). Philosophy of Science. In Barnes, J. (ed). The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press, 109-139.
Hofmeister Pich, R. (2008). Onipotência e conhecimento científico. En: Lertora-Mendoza, C. A. (coord). Juan Duns Escoto. Anais do XII Congresso Latino-Americano de Filosofia Medieval, Buenos Aires, 2008. Buenos Aires: FEPAI, 1-17.
Hofmeister Pich, R. (2001). Der Begriff der wissenschaftlichen Erkenntnis nach Johannes Duns Scotus. Bonn: Universität Bonn.
Hofmeister Pich, R. (2004). Subordinação das ciências e conhecimento experimental: um estudo sobre a recepção do método científico de Alhazen em Duns Scotus. In: Hofmeister Pich, R. & De Boni, L. A. (orgs.). A recepção do pensamento greco-árabe e judaico no Occidente Medieval. Porto Alegre: EDIPUCRS, 573-616.
Hofmeister Pich, R. (2008). Contingência e liberdade. In João Duns Scotus. Textos sobre poder, conhecimento e contingência. Porto Alegre: EDIPUCRS/EDUSF, 23-83.
Hofmeister Pich, R. (2008). João Duns Scotus. Textos sobre poder, conhecimento e contingência. Estudo introdutório, seleção de textos, estrutura, tradução, notas e índices de Roberto Hofmeister Pich. Porto Alegre: EDIPUCRS/EDUSF.
Höffe, O. (Hrsg.) (2005). Aristoteles-Lexicon. Stuttgart: Alfred Kröner Verlag.
Höffe, O. (1995). Ethik als praktische Philosophie - Methodische Überlegungen (I 1, 1094a22-1095a13). In: Höffe, O. (Hrsg.). Aristoteles - Die nikomachische Ethik. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 13- 38.
Honnefelder, L. (1994). Scientia in se - ciencia in Vobis: Zur philosophischen Bedeutung einer wissenschaftstheoretischen Unterscheidung. In Craemer-Ruegenberg, I. & Speer, A. (Hrsg.). Miscellanea Mediaevelia 22 - Scientia und ars im Hoch- und Spätmittelalter. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 204-214.
Honnefelder, L. (2005). Duns Scotus. München: Beck.
Ingham, M. B. (1996). The Harmony of Goodness. Mutuality and Moral Living according to John Duns Scotus. Quincy: Franciscan Press.
Judson, L. (1991). Chance and ‘Always or For the Most Part’ in Aristotle. In Judson, L. (ed). Aristotle’s Physics - A Collection of Essays, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 73-99.
Lambertini, R. (2000). La povertà pensata. Evoluzione storica della definizione dell'identità minoritica da Bonaventura ad Ockham. Modena: Mucchi Editore.
Lee, H. D. P. (1987). Introduction. In: Aristotle. Meteorologica.Transl. by H.D.P.Lee. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge/London: Harvard University Press/William Heinemann (repr.), ix-xxx.
Mandrella, I. (2002). Das Isaak-Opfer. Historisch-systematische Untersuchung zu Rationalität und Wandelbarkeit des Naturrechts in der mittelalterlichen Lehre vom natürlichen Gesetz. Münster: Aschendorff Verlag.
Marrone, S. P. (1985). Truth and Scientific Knowledge in the Thought of Henry of Ghent. Cambridge: The Medieval Academy of America.
Möhle, H. (2003). Scotus's Theory of Natural Law. In: Williams, T. (ed.).The Cambridge Companion to Duns Scatus.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 312-331.
O’Connor, E. D. (1968). The Scientific Character of Theology according to Scotus. In: De doctrina Ioannis Duns Scoti. Roma: Cura Comissionis Scotisticae, vol. III, 3-50.
Parisoli, L. (2001). La philosophie normative de Jean Duns Scot. Roma: Instituto Storico dei Cappuccini.
Parisoli, L. (2005). La contraddizione vera. Giovanni Duns Scoto tra le necessità della metafisica e il discorso della filosofia pratica. Roma: Instituto Storico dei Cappuccini.
Porchat Pereira, O. (2000). Ciência e dialética em Aristóteles. Sao Paulo: Editora UNESP.
Reeve, C. D. C. (1992). Practices of Reason. Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Salmon, W. C. (1983). Logik. Transl. By Joachim Buhl. Stuttgart: Philipp Reclam (repr. 1997).
Söder, J. R. (1999). Kontingenz und Wissen. Die Lehre von den futura contngentia bei Johannes Duns Scotus. Münster: Aschendorff.
Söder, J. R. (2005). Einleitung. In: Duns Scotus, Johannes. Pariser Vorlesungen über Wissen und Kontingenz - Reportatio Parisiensis examinata I 38-44. Lateinisch-Deutsch. Herausgegeben, übersetzt und eingeleitet von Joachim R. Söder. Freiburg: Verlag Herder, 9-32.
Sondag, G. (2005). Duns Scot. La métaphysique de la singularité. Paris: Vrin.
Vos, A. (2006). The Philosophy of John Duns Scotus. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Williams, T. (1998). The Libertarian Foundations of Scotus’s Moral Philosophy. The Thomist, 62, 193-215.
Williams, T. (1998). The Unmitigated Scotus. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 80, 162-181.
Williams, T. (2003). Introduction - The Life and Works of John Duns the Scot. In: Williams, T. (ed). The Cambridge Companion to Duns Scotus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1-14.
Wolter, A. B. (1990). Scotus’s Paris Lectures on God’s Knowledge of Future Events. In Adams, M. M. (ed.). The Philosophical Theology of John Duns Scotus. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 285-333.
Wolter, A. B. (1996). Reflections about Scotus’s Early Works. In Honnefelder, L., Dreyer, M. & Wood, R. (eds.). John Duns Scotus - Metaphysics and Ethics. Leiden: Brill, 37-57.
Wolter, A. B. & Bychkov, O. (2008). John Duns Scotus. The Examined Report of the Paris Lecture - Reportatio I-A. Latin Text and English Translation, Translation and Notes A. B. Wolter & O. Bychkov. New York: Franciscan Instituto Publications.
1. The authors who publish in this magazine accept the following conditions:
-
They retain the copyright and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work registered under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows third parties to use what is published as long as they mention the authorship of the work and the first publication in this magazine.
-
They can make other independent and additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this magazine (eg. include it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book) provided that they clearly indicate that the work was first published in this journal.
-
They are allowed and recommended to publish their work on the Internet (for example on institutional or personal pages).
2. AutoArchive Conditions. Authors are allowed and encouraged to distribute post-print electronic versions of their manuscripts because it promotes their circulation, a possible increase of quotation and a major reach among the Academic community. Color RoMEO: blue.
