Aristotelianism and Stoicism in Michael of Ephesus’ Commentary on Aristotle’s De motu animalium
Abstract
This paper aims to show that, despite the lapidary judgment of some scholars in recent decades regarding the philosophical interest of the Byzantine Michael of Ephesus, it is possible to find relevant aspects in his readings and interpretations of Aristotle. I will argue that Michael’s commentary on De motu animalium deserves to be treated seriously. In so far as Michael sometimes employs a Stoic conceptual model to account for Aristotle, he posits a new view of understanding the Aristotelian theory of action. Michael’s interpretations of the Aristotelian text are not mere repetitions; in some passages, one notices some developments beyond Aristotle, even though they presuppose quite clear Aristotelian premises.Downloads
References
Alessandro di Afrodisia (1996). L’ anima. Trad. Accatino, P. y Donini, P. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
Michael Psellvs (1989). Philosophica Minora, vol. II. Ed. O’Meara, D. J. Leipzig: Teubner.
Michaelis Ephesii (1904). Commentaria in Aristotelis Graeca. Michaelis Ephesii In libros De partibus animalium, De animalium motione, De animalium incessu. Ed. Hayduck, H. Berlín: Reimer. (CAG 23.2).
Aristóteles (2000). Partes de los animales. Marcha de los animales. Movimiento de los animales. Trad. Jiménez Sánchez-Escariche, E. y Alonso Miguel, A. Madrid: Gredos.
Aristote (2013). Le Mouvement des animaux, suive de La Locomotion des animaux. Trad. Morel, P.-M. París: Flammarion.
Aristotle (1985 [1978]). De Motu Animalium. Trad. Nussbaum, M. C. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Aristotle and Michel of Ephesus (1981). Aristotle On the Movement of Animals and Progression of Animals. Michael Commentaria in de Motu et de Incessu Animalium. Hildesheim - Nueva York: Georg Olms. (Studien zur Geschichte der Philosophie 22).
Aristotle (2020). Aristotle’s De motu animalium. Symposium Aristotelicum. Ed. Rapp, Ch. y Primavesi, O. Trad. Morison, B. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Alexander of Aphrodisias (2004). Supplement to On the Soul. Trad. Sharples, R. W. Londres - Nueva York: Bloomsbury.
Aoiz, J. (2015). “Aristóteles, De motu animalium 701a7-16”, Praesentia 16, 1-16.
Arabatzis, G. (2012). “Michel d’Ephèse, commentateur d’Aristote et auteur ”, Peitho / Examina Antiqua 1.3, 199-209.
Boeri, M. D. (2018). “Plato and Aristotle on What is Common to Soul and Body: Some Remarks on a Complicated Issue”. En: Boeri, M. D., Kanayama, Y. Y. y Mittelmann, J. (eds.). Soul and Mind in Greek Thought. Psychological issues in Plato and Aristotle. Cham: Springer, 153-176.
Browning, R. (1990). “An Unpublished Funeral Oration on Anna Comnena”. En: Sorabji, R. (ed.). Aristotle Transformed. The Ancient Commentators and their Influence. Ithaca - Nueva York: Cornell University Press, 393-406.
Cooper, J. M. (2020). “The Role of Thought in Animal Voluntary Self-Locomotion”. En: Rapp, C. y Primavesi, O. (eds.). Aristotle’s De motu animalium. Symposium Aristotelicum. Oxford - Nueva York: Oxford University Press, 345-386.
Couloubaritsis, L. (1986). “La psychologie chez Chrysippe”. En: Falshar, H y Gigon, O. (eds.). Aspects de la philosophie hellénistique. Vandoeuvres - Ginebra: Fondation Hardt, 99-146. (Entretiens sur l’antiquité classique 32).
Corcilius, K. (2008). Streben und Bewegen. Aristoteles’ Theorie der animalischen Ortsbewegung. Berlín - Nueva York: Walter de Gruyter. (Quellen und Studien zur Philosophie 79).
Crubellier, M. (2004). “Le ‘syllogisme pratique’ ou Comment la pensée meut le corps”. En: Laks, A. y Rashed, M. (eds.). Aristote et le mouvement des animaux. Dix études sur le De motu animalium. Villenuve d’Ascq: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion, 9-26.
Ebbesen, S. (2002). “Greek-Latin Philosophical Interaction”. En: Ierodiakonou, K. (ed.). Byzantine Philosophy and its Ancient Sources. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 15-30.
Forschner, M. (1995). Die stoische Ethik. Über den Zusammenhang von Natur-, Sprach- und Moralphilosophie im altstoischen System. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
Golitzis, P. (2016). “Who Were the Real Authors of the Metaphysics Commentary Ascribed to Alexander and Ps. Alexander?”. En: Sorabji, R. (ed.). Aristotle Reinterpreted. New Findings on Seven Hundred Years of the Ancient Commentators. Londres - Oxford - Nueva York - Nueva Delhi - Sydney: Bloomsbury, 565-587.
Gregoric, P. (2020). “Soul and Pneuma in De spiritu”. En: Coughlin, S., Leith, D. y Lewis, O. (eds.). The Concept of Pneuma after Aristotle. Berlín: Universität Berlin und der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 17-36.
Laks A. y Rashed, M. (eds.). (2004). Aristote et le mouvement des animaux. Dix études sur le De motu animalium. Villenuve d’Ascq: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion.
Luna, C. (2001). Trois études sur la tradition des commentaires anciens à la ‘Metaphysique’ d’Aristote. Leiden - Boston - Colonia: Brill.
Mele, A. (1984). “Aristotle on the Proximate Efficient Cause of Action”, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 10, 133-155.
Mele, A. (1987). Irrationality. An Essay on Akrasia, Self-Deception and Self-Control. Nueva York - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mele, A. (1999). “Aristotle on Akrasia, Eudaimonia, and Psychology of Action”. En: Sherman, N. (ed.). Aristotle’s Ethics: Critical Essays. Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield, 183-204.
Mercken, H. P. F. (1990). “The Greek Commentators on Aristotle’s Ethics”. En: Sorabji, R. (ed.). Aristotle Transformed. The Ancient Commentator and their Influence. Ithaca - Nueva York: Cornell University Press, 407-443.
Moraux, P. (1978). “Le De anima dans la tradition grecque. Quelques aspectes de l’interprétation du traité, de Théophraste à Thémistius”. En: Lloyd, G. E. R. y Owen, G. E. L. (eds.). Aristotle on Mind and the Senses. Proceedings of the Seventh Symposium Aristotelicum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 281-324.
Praechter, K. (1906). “Review of ‘Michaelis Ephesii In libros De partibus animalium comentaria’ ed. H. Hadyuck, CAG 23.2”, Göttingische Gelehrte Anzeigen 168, 861-907.
Praechter, K. (1990). “Review of the Commentaria in Aristotelem Karl Praechter”. En: Sorabji, R. (ed.). Aristotle Transformed. The Ancient Commentator and their Influence. Ithaca - Nueva York: Cornell University Press, 31-54.
Primavesi, O. (2020). “Introduction Part II: The Text of De motu animalium”. En: Rapp, C. y Primavesi, O. Aristotle’s De motu animalium. Symposium Aristotelicum. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 67-156.
Salis, R. (2005). Il commento de pseudo-Alessandro al libro Λ de la Metafisica di Aristotele. Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino Editore.
Tarán, L. (2001). “Ancient and Byzantine Philosophy”. En: Idem. Collected Papers. Leiden - Boston - Colonia: Brill, 646-666.
Tarán, L. (2005). “Nota crítica de Luna 2001”, Gnomon 77, 196-209.
Trizio, M. (2007). “Byzantine Philosophy as a Contemporary Historiographical Project”, Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie Médiévales 74.1, 247-294.
Vigo, A. G. (2009). “Alma, impulso y movimiento según Alejandro de Afrodisia”, Estudios de Filosofía 40, 245-278.
Zingano, M. (2008). “O Tratado do impulso e da faculdade impulsiva de Alexandre de Afrodisia e sua versão em Miguel de Éfeso”, Journal of Ancient Philosophy 2.2, 1-22.
1. The authors who publish in this magazine accept the following conditions:
-
They retain the copyright and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work registered under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows third parties to use what is published as long as they mention the authorship of the work and the first publication in this magazine.
-
They can make other independent and additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this magazine (eg. include it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book) provided that they clearly indicate that the work was first published in this journal.
-
They are allowed and recommended to publish their work on the Internet (for example on institutional or personal pages).
2. AutoArchive Conditions. Authors are allowed and encouraged to distribute post-print electronic versions of their manuscripts because it promotes their circulation, a possible increase of quotation and a major reach among the Academic community. Color RoMEO: blue.
